I.
Background
Agriculture remains a key pillar of Colombia’s
economic and social development. However, the country’s Sanitary and
Phytosanitary (SPS) system faces structural weaknesses that limit its ability
to effectively protect agricultural health from plant pests and animal diseases
and facilitate market access and international trade. In response to this
situation, the World Bank, in collaboration with the Colombian Agricultural
Institute (ICA), has been supporting the Government of Colombia (GoC) in
strengthening institutional capacities through analytical studies and technical
assistance.
In particular, the Agriculture and Food Global
Practice (AGF GP) of the World Bank conducted an analytical and advisory study titled
“Identifying Technical Gaps to Improve Technological Solutions for the
Integrated Management of Transboundary Diseases.” This study, part of the
Programmatic Advisory Services and Analytics (PASA) under the Sustainable and
Inclusive Transformation of the Colombian Agri-Food System (SIAT; P509672),
identified key areas for improvement in border control, especially with respect
to phytosanitary management.
Findings from this initial phase highlighted the need
to advance to a second phase, funded by the Korea–World Bank Partnership
Facility (KWPF), focused specifically on designing integrated solutions to
strengthen phytosanitary control mechanisms at the country’s points of entry.
The objective is to support the GoC’s strategic commitment to building a more
coherent, inclusive, and evidence-based agri-food system, while facilitating safe
trade.
In particular, the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA)
requires the country to adopt and maintain a border risk management system. Border
controls should focus on high-risk consignments and expedite the release of
low-risk consignments. Risk management shall be based on an assessment of risk
through appropriate selectivity criteria. The TFA stipulates that these may
include, inter alia, the Harmonized System (HS) code, nature and description of
the goods, country of origin, country from which the goods were shipped, value
of the goods, compliance record of traders, and type of means of transport. Against
this backdrop, the World Bank proposes hiring a specialized consulting firm (or
a team of consultants) to carry out an in-depth technical study and develop a
roadmap for the conceptual design of an integrated information system that will
help in establishing a safe, secure and more efficient agricultural trade
environment for Colombia. This system will aim to enhance phytosanitary
management at border control points through digital solutions that improve
institutional interoperability and the real-time collection, analysis, and use
of data, while aligning with international standards and responding to the
challenges of an increasingly dynamic global environment.
The system will proactively manage risks associated
with plant products traded at the border and ensure that inspections are only
carried out when necessary and based on risk. It will help the NPPO to better
prioritize its limited resources by identifying and segmenting those
commodities/traders who pose a higher risk. It will also enhance the efficiency
of phytosanitary management processes by automating manual tasks, reducing
paperwork, and streamlining workflows. The system will reduce unnecessary
barriers to trade, such as reducing time to release plant products at the
border, while improving Colombia’s plant health situation by targeting higher
risk plant products and better tracking of pests and diseases.
II.
Objective of the
Consultancy
The objective of this consultancy is to support the
World Bank team in advancing policy dialogue with ICA to strengthen its
capacity in risk-based border control, through the conceptual design of an
integrated information system. The consultancy will carry out an in-depth
technical study and develop a comprehensive strategy to improve Colombia’s
border control system for plant-based food. This strategy will seek to enhance
efficiency, effectiveness, and alignment with international standards,
identifying technological and operational solutions for each component and
delivering a clear roadmap for implementation.
III.
Activities
As part of the conceptual design of a digital solution
aimed at strengthened and more efficient phytosanitary border control, the
consultancy will carry out the following key technical activities:
- Assess ICA’s current data management capabilities
within the SPS system at border points
·
Conduct institutional
analysis of phytosanitary data processes (collection, analysis, use) at ports,
airports, and land crossings. This includes how data is
collected, processed, stored, shared, and used for decision-making.
·
Identify technical,
operational, and organizational limitations.
·
Highlight opportunities
for improvement based on international standards, especially for plant product
inspection and release.
- Benchmark
international good practices in digital SPS border control Systems
·
Identify and study 2–3
comparable international models of digital SPS data management systems (e.g.,
from countries with similar trade profiles or successful phytosanitary
systems).
·
Analyze key features of
these systems, including governance structures, data architecture, risk-based
inspection modules, interoperability with customs, and user interfaces.
·
Extract lessons
learned, including what has worked and what challenges were encountered in
their design and implementation.
·
Summarize
recommendations on good practices and components that could be tailored to the
Colombian context.
- Identify technological and interoperability gaps
in phytosanitary border control and trade
·
Review and benchmark
data flows between ICA’s territorial offices, laboratories, and relevant
agencies such as DIAN. (i.e. customs), including ICA’s connection to the
country’s Single Window, notably in relation to the issuance of import permits,
as well receiving electronic phytosanitary certificates (ePhyto).
·
Identify opportunities
to improve:
- Traceability
- Data quality
- Integration with customs and sanitary control
platforms
·
Explore improvements in
interoperability and automated data exchange, aligned with international
frameworks (e.g., ePhyto, IPPC, WCO, EPPO), to
support trade facilitation, streamline border procedures, and ensure alignment
with global phytosanitary and customs standards. This includes exploring the
integration of electronic certification systems, standardized data formats, and
real-time exchange of pest and inspection-related information.
·
Provide recommendations
on the creation of a border risk management system, including development of commodity-specific
risk profiles for traders being classified as high, medium or low risk, based
on the outcomes of a risk assessment, which could be a combination of:
- Commodity specific baseline risk rating, such as inherent
commodity risk (based on HS code), country of origin, and other risk factors,
such as volume of trade. In case the NPPO has conducted a pest risk analysis prior
to issuing the import permit, the results of this assessment can replace risk
rating.
- Compliance risk rating, based on actual observations
of compliance made by the NPPO through any of its activities (inspection,
testing, etc.).
·
Provide recommendations
to target activities and optimize inspection resources based on high risk - so
that not all commodities traded at the border are treated the same.
- Design a conceptual integrated information system
for phytosanitary border control
·
Propose a system
architecture covering:
- Efficient data collection (actors, sources, tools)
- Data analysis (processing, risk alerts,
interoperability)
- Data use for rapid decision-making (automated release
of the DIAN, prioritization, traceability)
·
Ensure alignment with:
- Scalability needs
- Institutional sustainability
- ICA’s strategic objectives
- Develop a roadmap for the implementation of the
proposed system
·
Formulate a phased
implementation strategy that includes:
- Timeline and milestones
- Required resources
- Institutional roles and responsibilities
- Technical and operational guidelines
·
Prioritization of high-risk,
high-volume border control points
- Prepare a proposal to strengthen institutional
capacity to develop and maintain a robust risk-based phytosanitary border
management system
·
Recommend measures to
enhance
- Technical and human capacity
- Inter-institutional coordination
·
Focus areas may
include:
- Training for operational staff
- System sustainability
- Performance monitoring and evaluation
IV.
Deliverables
The final deliverable will be a report that includes
the following proposals and system improvement recommendations organized along
each key step of the phytosanitary border control process. These are intended
to guide the conceptual design of a digital solution that strengthens
interoperability and efficiency in each stage of border control:
- Reception of CIS (Import Request Submission)
·
Design of accessible
and efficient channels for applicants
·
Evaluation of digital
tools to streamline request reception
·
Improvement of the user
interface and standardization of user guidance
·
Analysis of average
request initiation time and benchmarking against international standards
·
Review of institutional
and technological capacities to reduce delays
·
Proposal for a
real-time traceability system and automated request classification
·
Review of data
standards for CIS
- Document Review
·
Implementation of
automated verification tools (OCR, digital checklists)
·
Development of user
guides and educational materials to reduce recurrent errors
·
Incorporation of
document filters and AI-based risk classification algorithms
- Determination of Quarantine Need
·
Update of
technical-scientific criteria and periodic review mechanisms, in alignment with
IPPC standards, as part of a border risk management approach the system should
enable differentiated treatment based on product type and country of origin,
supporting triage and prioritization of high-risk cases to optimize resource
allocation.
·
Strategy for
documenting decision-making processes and ensuring technical consistency
·
Functional design of
spaces and appropriate infrastructure to carry out effective quarantine
·
Implementation of
decision-support tools to accelerate processing
·
Improved coordination
between physical infrastructure (e.g. inspection posts) and operational
workflows
- Physical Inspection
·
Proposed strategies to
promote the use of portable devices and digital checklists to enhance
inspection speed and accuracy
·
Recommendations for
introducing dual verification mechanisms and real-time monitoring to strengthen
transparency and oversight
·
Conceptual proposal for
an integrated digital platform to facilitate coordination among ICA, DIAN, and
other relevant field-level entities
- Laboratory Analysis
·
Strategic options for
establishing public–private partnerships to outsource laboratory analysis and
reduce delays
·
Proposed approaches for
the adoption of automated sample traceability systems (barcodes, QR codes,
RFID)
·
Recommendations for incorporation
of rapid diagnostic test kits (RDTs) for high-frequency samples
·
Proposed strategy to
assess the feasibility of mutual recognition or equivalence agreements with
laboratories and certification bodies in exporting countries, with the aim of
streamlining clearance procedures. This includes reviewing existing agreements and
identifying opportunities for future alignment
- Result Evaluation
·
Adoption of a digital
system for notifying and tracking results to users
·
Integration of feedback
mechanisms to support continuous system improvement
·
Analysis of
post-inspection operational efficiency and regulatory adjustment proposals
·
Generation of automated
reports and dashboards for real-time decision-making
- Integrated Quarantine Information Management
System
·
System design strategies
to enhance interoperability for real-time data exchange, in alignment with reporting
obligations under IPPC
·
Functional elements to
support automation of customs clearance processes (such as algorithm to determine
release, further inspection, or disposal) based on inspection results
·
Proposed approach for integrating
databases and development of APIs among ICA, DIAN, INVIMA, and others
·
Strategies to
capacitate staff and strengthen inter-institutional coordination
·
Legal review and
regulatory review to identify necessary conditions for enabling automated
decision-making
V.
Timeline and
Payment Schedule
The following table summarizes the proposed timeline
and payment schedule for the consultancy. The consulting firm (or a team of
consultants) shall submit a Project Work Plan no later than one (1) month after
the contract is signed. The World Bank team will review the plan and agree with
the firm on final dates and deliverables for each phase.
Deadline
Deliverable
% Payment
August 1, 2025
Contract signed
—
August 31, 2025
Approved work
plan
10%
October 31, 2025
Intermediate
report
30%
December 31,
2025
Final validated
report
60%
Payments will be subject to the approval of deliverables
by the World Bank technical team.
VI.
Profile of the
consulting firm (or team of consultants)
The consulting firm (or a team of consultants) must
have a proven track record in designing, assessing, or implementing
technological solutions for information and risk management in the public
sector, preferably in areas related to sanitary, phytosanitary, or agri-food
systems.
General Experience:
- At
least 10 years of experience in technology consulting projects,
information systems, digital transformation, or data analytics applied to
government institutions or entities in the agri-food sector.
Specific Experience:
- Demonstrated
experience in the conceptual design or implementation of integrated
information systems for managing complex data, institutional information
flows, and/or institutional intelligence.
- Participation
in at least XX projects related to sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS)
measures, agri-food traceability, epidemiological surveillance, or data
collection and analysis systems in the agricultural or health sectors.
- Prior
experience in consultancies funded by multilateral organizations (World
Bank, IDB, FAO, or others) will be positively considered.
VII.
Project and
Personnel Management
The consulting firm/consultant will be responsible for
all administrative and operational tasks related to its personnel assigned to
this project, as well as for the coordination, supervision, and planning of
activities, logistical support, transportation, and all necessary actions to
fulfill its responsibilities.
The (firm's) team leader will provide overall project
oversight and lead interactions with the World Bank team. The consulting firm
(or a team of consultants) will be supported by a World Bank staff member
assigned to the project, who will manage day-to-day coordination with the
consulting team.
VIII.
Collaboration
between the World Bank and ICA
The designated representative from the consulting firm
(or individual consultant) must maintain regular communication with the World
Bank to provide periodic progress reports and project updates. They will also
work directly with the World Bank technical team to gather key information and
data required to achieve the objectives of the consultancy.
Furthermore, the consultant must establish a clear and
efficient communication channel with ICA, as the technical counterpart, to
ensure alignment with its priorities and expectations throughout the
development of the study.
Collaboration with ICA will include the coordination
of regular meetings, requests for relevant information, and the exchange of key
progress updates. This engagement will be essential to ensure that the study’s
recommendations and outcomes reflect ICA’s needs and goals, thereby enhancing
their relevance and applicability in the Colombian context.
All communication, whether with the World Bank or ICA,
must be conducted in Spanish or English to ensure a clear and efficient
exchange of information and ideas throughout the duration of the project.
IX.
Reporting and
Approval of Deliverables
All reports and documentation must
be written in Spanish and submitted in draft form to the World Bank Technical
Task Team Leaders for review and approval. The consulting firm (or a team of
consultants) will report directly to Ena Shin, Task Team Leader, Agricultural
Economist (eshin1@worldbank.org), Mariangela Ramirez Diaz, Co-TTL, Senior Agriculture
Specialist (mramirezdiaz@worldbank.org), and Asa Gierta, Co-TTL, Senior Agriculture
Economist (agiertz@worldbank.org).
These professionals will be responsible, on behalf of
the World Bank, for contract management and supervision, and will provide
comments and feedback on the submitted documents within one week.
The consulting firm (or consultant) must deliver the
outputs outlined in Section IV to the World Bank and coordinate project
activities accordingly. Any modification to the assigned tasks must be
discussed and approved in advance by the World Bank team to ensure continued
alignment with the project’s objectives.